"Passing Glory" - Past History 1965 Revisited
by
Russell L. Stockard, Sr.
In 1965 New Orleans, racial division extended beyond the water
fountains and restaurants and into the schools where Black and white students
could neither learn nor play together.
In high school sports, St. Augustine High School, a Black, all-male private
high school, led the Louisiana Interscholastic Athletic Literary (LIALO). The
champions of the white league, Louisiana High School Athletic Association (LHSAA)
was Jesuit High, another all-male institution. At the end of the 1965 regular
season, the teams had 30-0 and 29-1 records, respectively, and Hap Glaudi, a WWL-TV
sports commentator during the 60’s, reportedly asked, "Why shouldn’t
these two outstanding teams play against each other?" Glaudi was of the
impression that there was nothing wrong with two local Catholic schools playing
each other in a game of basketball, no matter the races of those players. The
schools did indeed play each other, and years later the historic basketball game
between Jesuit and St. Augustine interested Hollywood enough to create a
fantasy, made-for-television movie, "Passing Glory." This movie left
reality to the past and its significance to obscurity.
In defense of the movie's inaccuracies, Harold Sylvester, the athlete turned
actor who wrote it said, "Passing Glory is a story, but not history."
For a movie based on such an historical event, however loosely the basis, it
unfortunately possessed little accuracy as to what actually happened before,
during and after the game. As a staff sportswriter of the city’s afternoon
newspaper, The States-Item, and the first Black sportswriter of a daily paper in
the south, I was present at the game, and feel it's time to set the record
straight!
I covered the city’s Black high school sports beginning in 1960 because
white reporters wouldn’t. As a reporter, I viewed the white games as well. I
always felt, secretly, that the best teams of the LIALO (Black basketball
league) were superior to those of the LHSAA (white basketball league).
I was aware of the social implications of a game between the two high school
champions. Many knew it would have been a match made in heaven, but legally and
racially, it was unthinkable at the time. The Jesuit Blue Jays would have been
suspended from the tightly structured and segregated LHSAA if they had played
St. Augustine in a regularly scheduled basketball game.
The instigating Hap Glaudi and his on-air references, piqued the interest of
all who listened. Many of us who were familiar with Hap’s stance on race,
could not believe he was sincere.
St. Augustine principal, Father Grant, called me and asked what I thought
about the "reality of the two teams playing."
"If Hap Glaudi is interested in such a game, there must be many more
people thinking the same way," I answered.
A day later, I was asked by an administrator at Jesuit, if I thought a game
between the two schools would result in racial discord.
"Heck no! Not a chance," was my resounding reply.
The following day, a Jesuit administrator established the conditions to be
agreed upon by St. Augustine in order for the game to take place. These
conditions stated that the game must be held in the Jesuit gym, the game's
officials would be chosen by Jesuit, and the only spectators would be a few
school administrators.
Father Grant and St. Augustine Coach, Nick Conner, readily agreed to their
terms, believing that this contest would help integrate the Archdiocese of New
Orleans. Coach Conner felt that this game, or scrimmage, whether help in public
or private would be an easy contest to coach.
The Jesuits, on the other hand, had conflicting emotions about the match. The
Jesuit players’ boastful youth and longstanding beliefs of racial superiority
made them confident that they could win. Initially, Jesuit’s head coach and
principal did not want the match, perhaps because they felt their team was not
as talented as their cross-town counterparts.
The St. Augustine squad of Isiah King, Harold Sylvester, Noel Foucher,
Charles Manego, Lawrence Girard, Bobbie Sardie, Frank Adams, Albert White,
Terrance Saulny and Ernest Johnson were athletically superior to Jesuit’s
Billy Fitzgerald, Chris Jennings, Faban Mang, Ronnie Britsch and Joe Williamson.
A comparison of the once-defeated Blue Jays and undefeated Purple Knights was
easy because the teams typified the difference(s) of how basketball was played
by teams in the old LHSAA and teams in the all-Black LIALO. For the most part,
LHSAA basketball teams in the 60’s were similar to the 1965 Jesuit Blue Jays,
while the LIALO teams were a carbon copy of St. Augustine (or attempted to be).
Historical inaccuracies:
The movie "Passing Glory" contained several historical
inaccuracies. First of all, the personality of the 1965 St. Augustine team was
never revealed in the movie. Also, Coach Nick Connor’s all important role in
the event was never exhibited. The movie depicted the coach of St. Augustine as
a young priest having neither coaching experience nor, for that matter, any
knowledge of the game of basketball. In truth, by 1965, Coach Connor had been
the head basketball coach at St. Augustine for 14 years, and had served as head
football coach for 12 years.
The movie also inaccurately portrayed the game as an extension of an earlier
confrontation between players on the two teams, while in reality, the players
only knew of each other, but had never met before the game, socially or
athletically.
Additionally, the high-drama of the movie was a calculated misrepresentation
of how close the contest was. In reality, St. Augustine's victory was never in
doubt, having established a 14-point lead with 2:10 remaining in the first
quarter. This lead was never threatened as the contest progressed. In the second
half , Coach Connor played his entire squad as The Purple Knights continued to
embarrass the Blue Jays. The final score of 81-59 was a true indication of the
difference in the talents exhibited in this game.
Creative license aside, the movie engages in a cinematic injustice in its
attempt to interfuse the personalities of Isaiah King and Harold Sylvester.
Realistically, it would be impossible to develop a single personality-image of
King and Sylvester. This would be unrealistic because they were so different in
appearance, as players and as students.
Both measured in the basketball-neighborhood of 6-feet and 6 inches, King’s
longer arms giving one the impression that he was taller. These long arms
enabled him to "play" taller. As basketball authorities acknowledge,
the arms of a basketball player provide a significant advantage in rebounding
and shooting over the outstretched arms of an opponent. Additionally, King was
never serious about basketball, his classes or his books. But man, could he jump
and score!
Sylvester, on the other hand, was a more methodical and heady player. As the
best rebounder on the ’65 team, he knew how to get into the proper position
for rebounds. He certainly would have scored more if King had not been on the
team. Sylvester was quiet, bookish and a very good student. And he proved it by
obtaining a four-year undergraduate degree from Tulane University while a
varsity athlete.
Importantly, the movie neglected to properly portray the serious demeanor of
a vast majority of the St. Augustine High School students, and chose instead to
portray the students as undisciplined and playful. However, Father Grant and
Joseph Verrett, as the school’s principal and assistant principal, ran a very
tight ship, with zero tolerance for foolishness and frivolity. Having viewed St.
Augustine’s athletes during the 50’s and 60’s during Father Grant’s
regime, I never saw one athlete on the field, court or track behave in a manner
that was in contrast to the ideals promoted by the school’s administrators.
Jesuit's players were truly a team. The Jesuit coach, Dick Frances, obviously
had drilled the team concept into each member of his squad. This concept has its
advantages when there is a shortage of outstanding athletic talent. The Purple
Knights were not as conscious of executing precise plays as Jesuit was. Coach
Frances’ team depended upon "picks and rolls" because they played
within the team concept. St. Augustine's play was highlighted by the individual
skills of King, Sylvester, Foucher and Manago.
St. Augustine's team possessed outstanding athletic abilities. Guards Noel
Foucher and Charles Manego were all-city honorees in four and three sports
respectively. King and Sylvester were great offensive and defensive players.
Jesuit did not have a single player of the overall talents of Foucher, Manego,
King and Sylvester.
I am not saying that the Jesuit starters of Mang, Jennings, Fitzgerald,
Ronnie Britoch and Joe Williamson were not very good players (their record would
undermine any such suggestion). Jesuit was a good team, but St. Augustine had so
much talent that the team concept wasn’t as necessary as when talent is
limited.
Those who watched and remembered the 1965 St. Augustine basketball team, will
have to agree with Coach Connor when he stated…"It was the easiest team
to coach that I experienced in all of my years at St. Augustine. King,
Sylvester, Manago, and Foucher all were ideal players to coach. Fouls didn’t
bother us because we had so much talent on the bench," laughed Coach
Connor.
What the contest did achieve was quite obvious at that time: it allowed two
Catholic schools in the same Archdiocese to trust each other. That there needed
to be a semi-private basketball game between two Catholic high schools within
the same city was in my estimation, a sad commentary upon the state of the
Archdiocese of New Orleans in 1965.
As proof of how this game engendered trust within the Archdiocese, St.
Augustine was invited to participate in the annual Catholic Youth Organization (CYO)
basketball tournament for the first time several months later. Xavier Prep,
another historically Black Catholic high school in New Orleans, also
participated for the first time in 1965.
St. Augustine went to the finals that first year. However, a year later they
won the CYO tournament and Harold Sylvester was named the Most Valuable Player.
Those of us who can vividly recall the social and legal conditions which
existed in 1965, can appreciate the candid approach taken by the two schools
(especially Jesuit), in acknowledging this event. It would have been easier (as
the racial rationale existed in ‘60’s) not to acknowledge this event. Time,
apparently, contributes to candidness, as well as other positive attributes!
Ironically, this game had repercussions for the two teams in a different
manner, as each went on to play in their respective prep association state
tournaments.
Jesuit had more to "prove" after losing the scrimmage/game to the
Purple Knights. They "reestablished" their cage credibility by winning
the 1965 LHSAA championship.
Coach Connor’s squad was unable to duplicate its outstanding performance
against Jesuit. Thus, they lost an LIALO first round game to a team (Scotlandville)
they had defeated during the regular season.
Years later Coach Connor gave an unemotional belated resolve to the ’65
game against Jesuit: "I would have preferred losing that scrimmage to
Jesuit and winning the 1965 LIALO state championship," stated the affable
Coach Connor who is now retired. Coach Connor’s desire to win an LIALO
championship rather than the scrimmage against Jesuit is a part and parcel of
every coach’s psyche: championships outline everything else.
For Jesuit that game/scrimmage probably produced a greater desire to win the
LHSAA championship. For the Purple Knights their season became a success with
the Jesuit game/scrimmage victory.
As Coach Connor expressed years later: " I knew our season was over the
moment we departed from the Jesuit gym."
|