|
|
|
Black Collegian Career Center
Civil Rights for Young Workers
As retail stores and restaurants ramp up seasonal hiring, young
and student workers need to know about legal protections should incidents of discrimination and harassment arise
By Paul Igasaki, IMDiversity.com Featured EEO Columnist
December 2004 - The other day an optician asked my
advice about his daughter's teenage friends who worked for an older professional
who was doing “inappropriate” things that made them uncomfortable. He was
touching them a lot, the optician said, in ways that could be in and of
themselves explained away as accidental, but not with that frequency. The
employer asked the teenagers lots of personal questions and finally asked one of
them out. They were 16. He was around 70. The optician wondered if the teenagers
had rights or if quitting was their only option.
Generally, any workplace rights adults would have would also protect young
people. The phenomenon of sexual harassment is about power, and that is nowhere
more clear than where the victim is a teenager and the harasser an adult.
Employment for young workers is more likely to be low-wage, limited-term and
even part-time. The young worker is less likely to be familiar with workers'
rights or company policies. Further, young people are taught to respect their
elders, and despite modern cautions that no one can touch you against your will,
it is always difficult to take the risk of coming forward. If people
experiencing harassment or unfair treatment are underage, they may be reluctant
to talk about the problem with adults. When the problem touches on sex,
teenagers may not feel comfortable discussing the topic even with their own
parents.
The problem of young people being discriminated against extends beyond sexual
harassment. Harassment based upon ethnicity, religion or disability is also a
serious problem for younger victims. Age discrimination only applies to those
over 40 years old, but many who discriminate feel more confident with targets
that are underage. In a case involving two deaf teens in Arizona, they were
denied stock maintenance jobs at a retail store due, they allege, to their
deafness.
The restaurant business -- especially fast food or casual
restaurants -- is at the forefront in the filing of teen
discrimination claims
|
So few of the youths who face discrimination come forward. Even if the
harassment is very painful, more often than not, they do not want to take the
risks or the time to complain. When they do, it is not infrequent that their
complaints will be ignored at first, with junior supervisors believing a
permanent worker over a temporary student.
When I was at the EEOC, we recognized this problem and prioritized our outreach
to educate teenagers and other young people of their rights. The current
administration has also made it a priority, calling their program Youth@Work. It
is an appropriate and needed program, and I salute my successors in continuing
critical education work in this area. Informing teens about their rights and
their protection against retaliation is being done in the workplace, in schools
and through the media.
During the holidays, many retail stores hire young workers to respond to the
hoped-for increase in business. Low-wage, part-time and temporary seasonal
positions are important opportunities for entry-level workers and students in
between semesters to earn experience and some income. In this environment, with
a rapid rise in laborers knowing less about legal protections and corporate
policy, incidents of discrimination are more likely to occur. Many industries
other than retail sales are affected by this phenomenon, but it is the
restaurant business -- especially fast food or casual restaurants -- at the
forefront in the filing of teen discrimination claims.
In fact, the highest profile cases have involved restaurants. In one case,
Burger King settled a claim for $400,000 involving sexual harassment of a number
of teens working at a St. Louis-area franchise. Groping and vulgar comments were
reported by a number of workers. In another case at a Mexican restaurant, a 19
year old male supervisor made a 16 year old female worker come in to work only
to discover that she was the only one there. He kissed and touched her against
her will. When she complained to the manager, her allegations were denied. When
the incident was reported to the police, the supervisor was charged with sexual
assault. After EEOC filed suit, the restaurant settled for $150,000 in damages
to the worker and $150,000 to support public education against sexual
harassment.
It isn’t easy standing up against someone with more power and often
more knowledge and experience, especially when they control your
paycheck and, in some types of student employment, can affect your
grades
|
It is important to note that discrimination law is not the only course to
follow. In cases where the victim is underage, or the harassment becomes
physical, criminal charges may provide a stronger response. The charge can range
from sexual assault or battery to statutory or coercive rape. This may provide
quicker protection and can be the course followed when the company is reluctant
to act. Police involvement is likely to bring a response.
In another case, two male grocery store workers complained after a female store
manager had talked with them about her sexual experiences, flashed her breasts
at them, rubbed up against them, told other workers that one of them was her
“boyfriend,” and, after one of them quit, argued with the remaining young
worker. After complaining to her superior, the second young worker was fired for
“unprofessional conduct.” In this case, in addition to harassment, retaliation
appears to have taken place. The EEOC filed suit. Other cases involved a bagel
shop and a golf course.
-----
In cases of this sort, the monetary damage awards can be misleading or seem
confusing to older people. After all, even in a legitimate claim, one might ask
how much is really "lost" by a young person possibly working for a brief stint
at a low-paying gig, with other opportunities and career options ahead of them.
Viewed in this limited light, the loss of a presumably temporary,
burger-flipping job may seem "no big deal" or not worthy of significant damages.
Some may even suspect that complaints are a "scam" to win big awards.
Yet, it is important to note that most people (of any age) involved in
disputes over sexual harassment are not thinking of damage awards, but of their
safety, continuation in their employment, and hopefully preventing a predatory
employer or supervisor from hurting others. For, as I have discussed in previous
columns, sexual harassment is usually not an isolated offense; where there is
smoke from one incident, there may have been other fires before, and it often
requires having someone file a complaint to stop a harasser from going on to
discriminate against others. The courts have held that the employer is in the
best position to act to prevent harassment and damages have provided an
incentive for most employers to move to avoid incidents.
Further, people who enter the legal system in bad faith to make a quick buck
are rarely successful and few try. The risks and demands of pursuing a claim for
workers of any age are real and, depending on the facts, there isn’t a guarantee
about the result. Even more so for young victims -- who have little experience
with any kind of legal proceeding -- there may be a desire to just avoid the
hassle of pursuing a claim, finish their work and move on.
That is
not to say that the charges are likely to be violations. Most charges, in fact,
are not successful. It is important to note that not
all apparently unfair situations constitute illegal acts and that, at least
initially, the burden of proof lies with the complainant.
----
The workplace is an adult environment. One can learn a great deal about respect,
hard work, the value of money and honesty. At the same time one can see quickly
that while most respect the rights of others, one who doesn’t can cause great
pain and difficulty. It isn’t easy standing up against someone with more power
and often more knowledge and experience, especially when they control your
paycheck and, in some types of student employment, can affect your grades.
Young people who show the courage that it takes to assert their rights may make
that workplace, and indeed other workplaces, safer and fairer for all who work
there. That kind of courage will serve that person, their employers and our
nation throughout their life.
Paul Igasaki is a consultant in diversity, equal
opportunity, government and community affairs. Recently, he edited A Call to
Action, a historic policy platform for a coalition of national Asian Pacific
American organizations. Appointed by President Bill Clinton, he served as Vice
Chair or acting Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from
1994 to 2002, gaining recognition for restructuring the agency to eliminate a
crippling case backlog and for building credibility in protecting the rights of
immigrant Americans and victims of sexual harassment. He previously served as
Executive Director of the Asian Law Caucus in San Francisco and as Washington,
D.C. Representative of the Japanese American Citizens League. He also worked for
the City of Chicago, his hometown, as a liaison to Asian American communities
and as a Mayoral advisor on human relations and affirmative action. His career
also included efforts to provide civil legal services to the poor, both at the
national level for the American Bar Association supporting collaborations
between legal aid and private attorneys and at the local level as a legal
services attorney in Sacramento, California. He is an attorney in California
and Illinois, and was a graduate of Northwestern University and the University
of California, Davis.
|