Do You Want to Win in Engineering in the 21st Century?
by Marvin V. Greene
If you want to succeed in
engineering, you might start with a career laundry list from someone who trains
engineers for a living and understands what it takes to succeed in the
profession -- Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson. Jackson (left) is president of
Rensselaer Polytechnic University in Troy, N.Y., founded in 1824 as the nation's
first technological university. But before ramping up to career-mode, students
need to understand what engineering means today. "The engineering
profession," Jackson says, "is at the forefront of rapid, global
technological change. While change is dynamic, strategic and challenging for
engineers, the practice of engineering in 21st century remains very much a
traditional profession," she explains. "The engineer's long-standing
role as problem solver is as succinct as it was generations ago when pioneering
African Americans like Elijah McCoy invented self-lubricating devices for
locomotives and machines; Granville Woods, telephone and telegraph equipment;
and Garrett Morgan, the automated traffic signal," Jackson noted at a
February 2001 address on national competitiveness at the Los Alamos National
Laboratory. "Engineers, in the end, take knowledge and apply it to solve
problems," Jackson says.
Dr.
Sandra J. Baylor, (right) an engineer and inventor with IBM's T.J. Watson
Research Center, adds to the definition: "We build things, new and
different, that improve upon things that already exist. We invent things that
improve upon our everyday lives and how we live our everyday lives."
Over the last decade, engineering like many other industries,
has been transformed by today's information-technology economy --
specifically the Internet. "There is a greater recognition of how much
technology and the discoveries of science have driven the economy and have made
people more aware of engineers and their role in fueling the economy and
creating a better quality of life for people in the society as a whole,"
Jackson says. The Internet phenomenon is touching each of the profession's
primary disciplines -- civil engineering, mechanical engineering, chemical
engineering, electrical engineering, industrial engineering -- and not just
computer, software, systems and network engineers.
"The key consideration for students today is to blend
computer/Internet skills with their own specific engineering disciplines,"
Jackson says. "What we are trying to educate our students about is that the
so-called traditional fields are becoming, in and of themselves, more connected
to IT and computer engineering with a focus on things such as the design of
intelligent highways and intelligent buildings or sensors built into buildings
or civil infrastructures which can tell you how they age," Jackson
explains. "The people who are going to be hot are those who can marry
computer-related skills into the traditional disciplines."
In choosing an engineering discipline, Baylor, a specialist in
parallel computing based in San Jose, California, who has electrical engineering
degrees from Southern, Stanford and Rice universities, advises students to be
true to their own interests. "There are always going to be some areas that
are going to be more glamorous than others, but it all depends on what your
interests are. You may be interested in something that may not be glamorous. But
when it's all said and done, you have to do what's exciting to you," Baylor
says.
Jackson, Baylor and other engineering educators and
professionals say students and graduating engineering majors must be vigilant
and get ahead of the pace of change as they craft their careers. While the job
market is stable for engineers, it is continually changing in light of cyclical
market and economic forces. The slumping U.S. economy of 2000 and 2001, with its
attendant job layoffs, reduced capital spending and dwindling corporate profits,
hasn't dampened the long-term prospects of engineers.
"Yet
contemporary economic conditions have changed the way corporations and
organizations are deploying their work forces in the short-term," says Eric
A. Adolphe, (left) founder and chief executive officer of OPTIMUS
Corp. in Ellicott City, Md., a technology company that focuses on wireless
communications and computer networking. Adolphe says today's job market reminds
him of the one he confronted when he graduated in 1988 from the City College in
New York (CCNY) with a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering. Adolphe
worked for two organizations, including the Federal Aviation Administration,
before founding his own company in 1992. "The market was flat. I can
remember graduating and a lot of people were worried about getting a job,"
Adolphe says. Like all industries, cycles occur when employers control market
demand for workers, and, to the contrary, when employees have the advantage.
"And while jobs remain plentiful for engineers with high starting salaries,
some employers have gladly pulled back on perks, like stock options, while
demanding that new workers be flexible enough to do multiple tasks,"
Adolphe says.
Adolphe points the finger at the dot-com bust of 2000.
"Beginning from the mid-1990s, engineers and technical workers jumped from
employer to employer and dot-com to dot-com in search of the best deal. For now,
at least, that kind of employment landscape has subsided," he says.
"When the Internet boom took off, key engineers went over to dot-coms for
$20,000 or $30,000 more a year. We (employers) said, 'This is our death knell
here.' It was like a big sucking sound. They were just sucking all the
talent," he says. However, today, "When I look at the market, it's
sort of shifting back to the employers having more of an advantage. A couple of
years ago, the employees had complete advantage. For those coming out of school,
if you had anything related to IT in your background, you commanded a huge
salary. Now the engineers are saying, 'I'll forgo the stock options. I'm looking
for more stability.' They're also looking for breadth. They want to learn as
much technology as possible, and that keeps you in demand," adds Adolphe.
Starting salaries for engineers remain at the top of career
yardsticks. Expected starting salaries for bachelor's degree holders for the
2000-2001 time period for engineers in all majors was $41,700 to $44,000, the
same as in 1999-2000, according to the 30th annual Recruiting Trends Survey conducted
by Michigan State University's Collegiate Employment Research Institute.
Comparatively, expected starting salaries for engineers rated
well above those who graduated with undergraduate business degrees ($35,600 to
$39,100), for instance, and behind computer science majors ($42,750 to $46,900),
the Recruiting Trends Survey reported. Among engineering disciplines,
chemical engineers could expect a starting salary in 2000-2001 of $46,800 to
$48,600; computer engineers $45,400 to $50,300; electrical engineers $44,400 to
$48,300; mechanical engineers, $44,100 to $47,800; civil engineers $40,400 to
$42,400; and industrial engineers, $39,900 to 43,400, the survey said.
The National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) in
Bethlehem, Pa., which also tracks employment trends, notes that while engineers
and technical workers had to work harder in 2001 than in 2000 to find positions
because of the dot-com shakeout, salary offers remain strong. Computer
engineering graduates saw their average salary offers increase 8.1 percent from
July 2000; civil engineering graduates 8.1 percent; petroleum engineering
graduates 8 percent; electrical engineering graduates 7 percent; and chemical
engineering graduates 4.2 percent, NACE reported. Factors keeping demand strong
for engineering graduates include an increasing baby-boomer population that is
reaching retirement age prompting corporations to bring in "bench
strength" and the launching of new projects following distractions from Y2K
concerns in 1999 and 2000, according to the NACE organization.
In addition, NACE said hot on the heels of graduates are
computer and electrical equipment manufacturers, computer systems design firms,
engineering services and consulting firms, and general contracting companies.
Among employers, EDS, Cap Gemini, Ernst & Young, Lucent Technologies,
General Motors, Accenture, Deloitte & Touche, Procter & Gamble, and
Caterpillar have announced plans to hire new engineers.
When Rensselaer's President Jackson lays out what budding
engineers have to do to be successful, her own credentials give credence to the
advice she offers. The 18th president in Rensselaer's history effective July 1,
1999, Jackson had served as chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission;
was a theoretical physicist at the former AT&T Bell Labs; is a member of the
National Academy of Engineering; and is a life member, the MIT Board of
Trustees, the first African-American woman to receive a doctorate (theoretical
physics) from MIT. She is passionate about technical education -- and just as
passionate that science and engineering must have the full participation of
minorities and women. Jackson's laundry list for engineering career success has
three fundamental building blocks: learn the basics; embrace the notion of
teamwork, and develop an entrepreneurial spirit. "The need for prospective
engineers to learn the fundamentals of science and math is time honored,"
Jackson says. "Students have to always get a grounding in the fundamentals.
They should not try to bypass learning the basic math and science that undergird
whatever field of engineering they enter," she explains.
Baylor of IBM offers that as students learn the basics, they
need to accept the fundamentals of math and science with curiosity. "I
would encourage them to be inquisitive, be curious. Ask questions about why
things work the way they do. Why do they do it this way as opposed to that way
and explore that concept further," says Baylor, who helped in the
development of Deep Blue, IBM's widely hailed chess-champion computer.
Jackson says that as a building block to success, teamwork is
central to engineering. The image once of the lone engineer hunkered down
working on a solution to a problem no longer applies. "Today's engineers
have to be able to work in multidisciplinary teams to begin to be able to see
the big picture even if they may be working on a very specific part of a larger
problem," Jackson says. "They have to be able to see more of the big
picture and to work with others to attack and solve problems."
Dr.
Allyson D. Yarbrough, principal director in the electronics engineering
subdivision at The Aerospace Corporation in El Segundo, California, adds that
within technical teams, today's engineer must be able to articulate solutions.
In the aerospace industry, for instance, teams may consist of an electrical
engineer, mechanical engineer and software engineer in addition to management
executives and military officials. Yarbrough, who has a master's and Ph.D. in
electrical engineering from Cornell University, says while engineers must be
technically competent, they must also possess well developed people and
communications skills as they traverse work groups. "The ability to bring
your slice of pie to the table and be able to integrate that in with the whole
solution, pieces of which other people are providing, is really important,"
she says. "The ability to communicate is the thing that ties it all
together. No matter how innovative or creative a solution I come up with, if I'm
not able to communicate that either verbally or with the written word, then the
efficiency of my solution is greatly diminished. And it might actually be
negated."
Adolphe of OPTIMUS believes engineers shouldn't "pooh
pooh" communications and liberal arts along with technical portions of
their training. "Good God, I cannot find an engineer who can write, and it
just seems to be getting worse. What has apparently happened is a lot of the
engineers went to school and said, 'I'm going to go out and make $150K a year
when I get out, if I'm the best coder on the planet.' So, they go out and take
all these classes, and then they do nothing but coding. And when they get out
that's all they know how to do," Adolphe says.
The third building block of Jackson's career laundry list is
developing a spirit of entrepreneurship about yourself. "Get some
entrepreneurial know how," Jackson says. "Engineers can learn how to
manage and run a company, which will serve them well whether they start their
own businesses or they go to work in another enterprise because they will know
the fundamentals of what it takes to build a business plan and then to operate
according to that."
Adolphe, who has completed a juris doctor degree from the
Catholic University Columbus School of Law, says engineers like himself, who
establish their own enterprises, must understand their weaknesses. "You
have to have a burning desire to become an entrepreneur, not sort of a casual
desire," he says. "You've got to make a very honest assessment of who
you are, where you are and what your limitations are. When you run a business,
you've got to say I want to be an entrepreneur. I don't want to code."
Marvin V. Greene has written
extensively for leading print and online publications including Forbes Special
Interest Publications, Telecommunications Reports International, U.S. Black
Engineer, Black Enterprise, the Phillips Business Information Media Group,
Washtech.com, and ChamberBiz.com.
|