|
|
|
African-American History
Why Africana History?
by John Henrik Clarke
Africa and its people are the most written about and the least understood
of all of the world's people. This condition started in the 15th and the
16th centuries with the beginning of the slave trade system. The Europeans
not only colonialized most of the world, they began to colonialize information
about the world and its people. In order to do this, they had to forget,
or pretend to forget, all they had previously known abut the Africans.
They were not meeting them for the first time; there had been another meeting
during Greek and Roman times. At that time they complemented each other.
The African, Clitus Niger, King of Bactria, wa also a cavalry commander
for Alexander the Great. Most of the Greeks' thinking was influenced by
this contact with the Africans. The people and the cultures of what is
known as Africa are older than the word "Africa." According to
most records, old and new, Africans are the oldest people on the face of
the earth. The people now called Africans not only influenced the Greeks
and the Romans, they influenced the early world before there was a place
called Europe.
When the early Europeans first met Africans, at the crossroads of history,
it was a respectful meeting and the Africans were not slaves. Their nations
were old before Europe was born. In this period of history, what was to
be later known as "Africa" was an unknown place to the people
who would someday be called, "Europeans." Only the people of
some of the Mediterranean Islands and a few states of what would become
the Greek and Roman areas knew of parts of North Africa, and that was a
land of mystery. After the rise and decline of Greek civilization and the
Roman destruction of the city of Carthage, they made the conquered territories
into a province which they called Africa, a word derived from "afri"
and the name of a group of people about whom little is known. At first
the word applied only to the Roman colonies in North Africa. There was
a time when all dark-skinned people were called Ethiopians, for the Greeks
referred to Africa as, "The Land Of The Burnt-Face People."
If Africa, in general, is a man-made mystery, Egypt, in particular,
is a bigger one. There has long been an attempt on the part of some European
"scholars" to deny that Egypt was a part of Africa. To do this
they had to ignore the great masterpieces on Egyptian history written by
European writers such as, Ancient Egypt. Light of the World, Vols. I &
II, and a whole school of European thought that placed Egypt in proper
focus in relationship to the rest of Africa.
The distorters of African history also had to ignore the fact that the
people of the ancient land which would later be called Egypt, never called
their country by that name. It was called, Ta-Merry or Kampt and sometimes
Kemet or Sais. The ancient Hebrews called it Mizrain. Later the Moslem
Arabs used the same term but later discarded it. Both the Greeks and the
Romans referred to the country as the "Pearl Of The Nile." The
Greeks gave it the simple name, Aegyptcus. Thus the word we know as Egypt
is of Greek Origin.
Until recent times most Western scholars have been reluctant to call
attention to the fact that the Nile River is 4,000 miles long. It starts
in the south, in the heart of Africa, and flows to the north. It was the
world's first cultural highway. Thus Egypt was a composite of many African
cultures. In his article, "The Lost Pharaohs of Nubia," Professor
Bruce Williams infers that the nations in the South could be older than
Egypt. This information is not new. When rebel European scholars were saying
this 100 years ago, and proving it, they were not taken seriously.
It is unfortunate that so much of the history of Africa has been written
by conquerors, foreigners, missionaries and adventurers. The Egyptians
left the best record of their history written by local writers. It was
not until near the end of the 18th century when a few European scholars
learned to decipher their writing that this was understood.
The Greek traveler, Herodotus, was in Africa about 450 B.C. His eyewitness
account is still a revelation. He witnessed African civilization in decline
and partly in ruins, after many invasions. However, he could still see
the indications of the greatness that it had been. In this period in history,
the Nile Valley civilization of Africa had already brought forth two "Golden
Ages" of achievement and had left its mark for all the world to see.
Slavery and colonialism strained, but did not completely break, the
cultural umbilical cord between the Africans in Africa and those who, by
forced migration, now live in what is called the Western World. A small
group of African-American and Caribbean writers, teachers and preachers,
collectively developed the basis of what would be an African Consciousness
movement over 100 years ago. Their concern was with African, in general,
Egypt and Ethiopia, and what we now call the Nile Valley.
In approaching this subject, I have given preference to writers of African
descent who are generally neglected. I maintain that the African is the
final authority on Africa. In this regard I have reconsidered the writings
of W.E.B. DuBois, George Washington Williams, Drusilla Dungee Houston,
Carter G. Woodson, Willis N. Huggins, and his most outstanding living student,
John G. Jackson. I have also re-read the manuscripts of some of the unpublished
books of Charles C. Seifert, especially manuscripts of his last completed
book, Who Are The Ethiopians? Among Caribbean scholars, like Charles C.
Seifert, J.A. Rogers (from Jamaica) is the best known and the most prolific.
Over 50 years of his life was devoted to documenting the role of African
personalities in world history. His two-volume work, World's Great Men
of Color, is a pioneer work in the field.
Among the present-day scholars writing about African history, culture
and politics, Dr. Yosef ben-Jochannan's books are the most challenging.
I have drawn heavily on his research in the preparation of this article.
He belongs to the main cultural branch of the African world, having been
born in Ethiopia, growing to early manhood in the Caribbean Islands and
having lived in the African-American community of the United States for
over 20 years. His major books on African history are: Black Man of the
Nile, 1979, Africa: Mother of Western Civilization, 1976, and The African
Origins of Major Western Religions, 1970.
Our own great historian, W.E.B. DuBois tells us, "Always Africa
is giving us something new . . . On its black bosom arose one of the earliest,
if not the earliest, of self-protecting civilizations, and grew so mightily
that it still furnishes superlatives to thinking and speaking men. Out
of its darker and more remote forest vastness came, if we may credit many
recent scientists, the first welding of iron, and we know that agriculture
and trade flourished there when Europe was a wilderness."
Dr. DuBois tells us further that, "Nearly every human empire that
has arisen in the world, material and spiritual, has found some of its
greatest crises on this continent of Africa. It was through Africa that
Christianity became the religion of the world . . . It was through Africa
that Islam came to play its great role of conqueror and civilizer."
Egypt and the nations of the Nile Valley were, figuratively, the beating
heart of Africa and the incubator for its greatness for more than a thousand
years. Egypt gave birth to what later would become known as "Western
Civilization," long before the greatness of Greece and Rome.
This is a part of the African story, and in the distance it is a part
of the African-American story. It is difficult for depressed African-Americans
to know that they are a part of the larger story of the history of the
world. The history of the modern world was made, in the main, by what was
taken from African people. Europeans emerged from what they call their
"Middle-Ages," people-poor, land-poor and resources-poor. And
to a great extent, culture-poor. They raided and raped the cultures of
the world, mostly Africa, and filled their homes and museums with treasures,
then they called the people primitive. The Europeans did not understand
the cultures of non-Western people then; they do not understand them now.
History, I have often said, is a clock that people use to tell their
political time of day. It is also a compass that people use to find themselves
on the map of human geography. History tells a people where they have been
and what they have been. It also tells a people where they are and what
they are. Most importantly, history tells a people where they still must
go and what they still must be.
There is no way to go directly to the history of African-Americans without
taking a broader view of African world history. In his book Tom-Tom, the
writer John W. Vandercook makes this meaningful statement: A race is like
a man.
Until it uses its own talents, takes pride in its own history, and
loves its own memories, it can never fulfill itself completely.
This, in essence, is what African-American history and what African-American
History Month is about. The phrase African-American or African-American
History Month, taken at face value and without serious thought, appears
to be incongruous. Why is there a need for an African-American History
Month when there is no similar month for the other minority groups in the
United States. The history of the United States, in total, consists of
the collective histories of minority groups. What we call 'American civilization'
is no more than the sum of their contributions. The African- Americans
are the least integrated and the most neglected of these groups in the
historical interpretation of the American experience. This neglect has
made African-American History Month a necessity.
Most of the large ethnic groups in the United States have had, and still
have, their historical associations. Some of these associations predate
the founding of the Association For The Study of Negro Life and History,
(1915). Dr. Charles H. Wesley tells us that, "Historical societies
were organized in the United States with the special purpose in view of
preserving and maintaining the heritage of the American nation."
Within the framework of these historical societies, many ethnic groups,
Black as well as white, engaged in those endeavors that would keep alive
their beliefs in themselves and their past as a part of their hopes for
the future. For African-Americans, Carter G. Woodson led the way and used
what was then called, Negro History Week, to call attention to his people's
contribution to every aspect of world history. Dr. Woodson, then Director
of the Association For the Study of Negro Life and History, conceived this
special week as a time when public attention should be focused on the achievements
of America's citizens of African descent.
The acceptance of the facts of African-American history and the African-American
historian as a legitimate part of the academic community did not come easily.
Slavery ended and left its false images of Black people intact. In his
article, "What the Historian Owes the Negro," the noted African-American
historian, Dr. Benjamin Quarles, says:
"The Founding Fathers, revered by historians for over a century
and a half, did not conceive of the Negro as part of the body of politics.
Theoretically, these men found it hard to imagine a society where Negroes
were of equal status to whites. Thomas Jefferson, third President of the
United States, who was far more liberal than the run of his contemporaries,
was never the less certain that "the two races, equally free, cannot
live in the same government."
I have been referring to the African origin of African-American literature
and history. This preface is essential to every meaningful discussion of
the role of the African-American in every aspect of American life, past
and present. I want to make it clear that the Black race did not come to
the United States culturally empty-handed.
The role and importance of ethnic history is in how well it teaches
a people to use their own talents, take pride in their own history and
love their own memories. In order to fulfill themselves completely, in
all of their honorable endeavors it is important that the teacher of history
of the Black race find a definition of the subject, and a frame of reference
that can be understood by students who have no prior knowledge of the subject.
The following definition is paraphrased from a speech entitled, "The
Negro Writer and His Relation To His Roots," by Saunders Redding,
(1960): Heritage, in essence, is how a people have used their talent to
created a history that gives them memories that they can respect, and use
to command the respect of other people. The ultimate purpose of history
and history teaching is to use a people's talent to develop an awareness
and a pride in themselves so that they can create better instruments for
living together with other people. This sense of identity is the stimulation
for all of a people's honest and creative efforts. A people's relationship
to their heritage is the same as the relationship of a child to its mother.
I repeat: History is a clock that people use to tell their time of day.
It is a compass that they use to find themselves on the map of human geography.
It also tells them where they are, and what they are. Most importantly,
an understanding of history tells a people where they still must go, and
what they still must be.
Early white American historians did not accord African people anywhere
a respectful place in their commentaries on the history of man. In the
closing years of the nineteenth century, African- American historians began
to look at their people's history from their vantage point and their point
of view. Dr. Benjamin Quarks observed that "as early as 1883 this
desire to bring to public attention the untapped material on the Negro
prompted George Washington Williams to publish his two-volume History of
The Negro Race in America from 1619 to 1880. The first formally trained
African-American historian was W.E.B. DuBois, whose doctoral dissertation,
published in 1895, The Suppression Of The African Slave Trade To The United
States, 1638-1870, became the first title to be published in the Harvard
Historical Studies. It was with Carter G. Woodson, another Ph.D., that
African world history took a great leap forward and found a defender who
could document his claims. Woodson was convinced that unless something
was done to rescue the Black man from history's oversight, he would become
a "negligible factor in the thought of the world. " Woodson,
in 1915, founded the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History.
Woodson believed that there was no such thing as, "Negro History.
" He said what was called "Negro History" was only a missing
segment of world history. He devoted the greater portion of his life to
restoring this segment.
Africa came into the Mediterranean world, mainly through Greece, which
had been under African influence, and then Africa was cut off from the
melting pot by the turmoil among the Europeans and the religious conquests
incident to the rise of Islam. Africa, prior to these events, had developed
its history and civilization, indigenous to its people and lands. Africa
came back into the general picture of history through the penetration of
North Africa, West Africa and the Sudan by the Arabs. European and American
slave traders next ravaged the continent. The imperialist colonizers and
missionaries finally entered the scene and prevailed until the recent re-emergence
of independent African nations.
Africans are, of course, closely connected to the history of both North
and South America. The African-American's role in the social, economic
and political development of the American states is an important foundation
upon which to build racial understanding, especially in areas in which
false generalization and stereotypes have been developed to separate peoples
rather than to unite them. Contrary to a misconception which still prevails,
the Africans were familiar with literature and art for many years before
their contact with the Western World. Before the breaking-up of the social
structure of the West African states of Ghana, Mali and Songhay and the
internal strife and chaos that made the slave trade possible, the forefathers
of the Africans who eventually became slaves in the United States, lived
in a society where university life was fairly common and scholars were
held in reverence.
To understand fully any aspect of African-American life, one must realize
that the African-American is not without a cultural past, though he was
many generations removed from it before his achievements in American literature
and art commanded any appreciable attention. Africana, or Black History,
should be taught every day, not only in the schools, but also in the home.
African History Month should be every month. We need to learn about all
the African people of the world, including those who live in Asia and the
islands of the Pacific.
In the twenty-first century there will be over one billion African people
in the world. We are tomorrow's people. But, of course, we were yesterday's
people, too. With an understanding of our new importance we can change
the world, if first we change ourselves.
Dr. John Henrik Clarke, a pre-eminent African-American historian,
is author of several volumes on the history of Africa and the Diaspora.
He is head of the Department of Black and Puerto Rican Studies at Hunter
College of the City University of New York.
|