|
African-American History
Along the Color Line
Halt the Machinery of Death
by
Dr. Manning Marable
The cruelest example of human rights violations in the United
States today is the death penalty. Everyone knows that the death penalty is not
now, nor has it ever been, a deterrent to violent crime. Social scientists for
decades have long established that the death penalty is inherently racist.
African-American defendants found guilty of the identical crime as a white
defendant are statistically at least four times more likely to be given the
death penalty. Black people currently comprise more than 40 percent of death row
inmates. Regional differences make it 160 times more likely that a person
convicted of a capital offense in the South will be executed than one in the
Northeast. And of course, the capital justice system can never guarantee that
innocent people won't be executed by the state. For these and other reasons, the
U.S. Supreme Court, in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia, outlawed capital
punishment.
Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, there has been mounting legal
evidence that capital punishment cannot be implemented in a fair and impartial
manner. The state of Illinois, for example, currently has 161 people on death
row. Since 1977, 12 people in Illinois have been executed, but 13 on death row
were proven to have been wrongly convicted. Several death row prisoners in
Illinois were freed after a Northwestern University journalism class proved that
they were innocent and that others had actually committed the crimes.
The Chicago Tribune recently examined the almost 300 cases in Illinois during
the past 23 years, in which the death penalty was rendered. About one half of
the 260 cases that were appealed were ultimately reversed in favor of new trials
or sentencing hearings. In at least thirty cases, the Chicago Tribune uncovered
that defendants in capital cases had been represented by attorneys who were
disbarred or suspended from legal practice.
This overwhelming evidence that innocent people were being executed in the
state prompted Illinois Governor George Ryan, a Republican, to order a halt on
the use of the death penalty. Ryan is a long-time supporter of capital
punishment. But as he explained to the press, "I now favor a moratorium,
because I have grave concerns about our state's shameful record of convicting
innocent people and putting them on death row."
The opposite extreme on the political spectrum from Ryan is represented by
another Republican, Texas Governor George W. Bush. A self-proclaimed
"compassionate conservative," Bush has been downright vicious in his
implementation of capital punishment. In six short years, Bush has presided over
the executions of more than one hundred people-and according to him, every
single one of them was guilty.
A recent New York Times article by Stephen B. Bright, the director of the
Southern Center for Human Rights in Atlanta, illustrates how the Texas
"assembly-line process" for dispatching people to the "execution
chamber" works. Texas has no public defender system, and attorneys who have
little or no experience in the defense of capital cases are assigned. They are
often unable to retain independent investigators to review the evidence
necessary to provide proof of a defendant's innocence. Bright notes, "The
Texas courts do not even require that defense counsels remain awake during
trials." In several capital cases, defense attorneys actually fell asleep,
and the defendants were sentenced to death. One of those convicted, Carl
Johnson, was executed in 1995.
The struggle to halt the execution of America's most prominent political
prisoner, African-American journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal, has helped to spark a
grassroots movement to end capital punishment. Legislatures in 16 of the 38
states with death penalty laws have or are reviewing moratoriums on executions.
Eight cities have called for a halt to capital punishment, of which the most
significant is Philadelphia. Last month, in a 12 to 4 vote, Philadelphia's City
Council approved a resolution demanding a two-year moratorium on implementing
the death penalty, and called for the creation of a new state commission to
study Pennsylvania's capital punishment. Democratic City Councilwoman Donna
Miller, who introduced the resolution, observed that "90 percent of the
people on Pennsylvania's death row are people who cannot afford legal counsel,
and 90 percent of those from Philadelphia are people of color."
In Congress, Democratic U.S. Senator Russ Feingold has called on the Clinton
administration to issue a similar moratorium on all federal executions. Feingold
explained that "the problems of inadequate representation, lack of access
to DNA testing, police misconduct, racial bias and even simple errors are not
unique to Illinois. These are problems that have plagued the administration of
capital punishment around the country since the reinstatement of capital
punishment almost a quarter century ago." Several months before Feingold's
public challenge, Attorney General Janet Reno authorized a review to determine
if racial disparities exist in federal capital punishment cases.
These hopeful signs provide encouragement to those of us who have always
opposed the death penalty. But we must take the struggle to halt capital
punishment to the next level. We should challenge elected officials who are
soliciting our votes in the fall 2000 elections to have the political and moral
decency to support the death penalty moratorium. In the words of Supreme Court
Associate Justice Harry Blackman, we must halt once and for all the
"machinery of death."

Dr. Manning Marable is Professor of History and Political
Science, and the Director of the Institute for Research in African-American
Studies, Columbia University.
|